Today's primary election for the attorney general of Wisconsin gives citizens a chance to vote in one of the most bitterly disputed, antagonistic electoral contests in state history. Both major parties are fielding two candidates, and though the general tone of the election has been disappointing, there is still ample reason for voters to get to the polls and do what is best for the state of Wisconsin.
Though both GOP candidates' support of the death penalty casts a long shadow over their platforms, Paul Bucher and J.B. Van Hollen have put enough distance between themselves in terms of their leadership styles and experience that Bucher comes across as the clear first choice. His experience as Waukesha District Attorney puts him in a better position to deal with such issues as the state's continuing battle with methamphetamine.
Between the Republicans, Bucher has also demonstrated that he is the more reasonable of the GOP candidates, less given to seeing things as black and white. Van Hollen, on the other hand, has severely damaged his own credibility with baseless claims about terrorist cells training in Wisconsin.
Democratic incumbent Peg Lautenschlager has been a competent attorney general and she has shown herself to be capable of taking on politicians from both sides of the aisle.
However, her drunken driving arrest taints the legitimacy of Lautenschlager's role as the state's top cop, and this would make her a liability for the Democratic Party in the general election.
For this reason, Dane Country Executive Kathleen Falk is a stronger, better candidate for the position. She has been a strong advocate for Wisconsin's environment and greater transparency in government. In an election year dominated by scandals, it may be time for a new name in the attorney general office.
