College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Yankees represent everything wrong with baseball

Columnist Nico Savidge discusses the problems with rooting for the Yankees

By Nico Savidge

|

Published: Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Updated: Monday, October 26, 2009

As I watched the New York Yankees celebrate their Game 6 ALCS victory and trip to the World Series, it finally hit me why they are the franchise I hate most in all of sports.


For years, there has been no team I despise more than the Yankees—more than the college rivals I’ve cheered against like Minnesota or Stanford, more than the Oakland Raiders and certainly more than any other baseball team.


Now I see why I hate the Yankees so much: They symbolize everything that is wrong with Major League Baseball, and embody all of the qualities that drew me away from the game in the first place. From terrible owners to inflated payrolls to gaudy stadiums, the Yankees have them all.


Let’s start with domineering owner George Steinbrenner. His style of management has already made him a caricature in the minds of many fans, and you would be hard-pressed to find any owner that fans and players hate more than him.


With the possible exception of Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban, Oakland Raiders owner Al Davis or former Cincinnati Reds owner Marge Schott, can you think of an owner who made himself more of a story than the team as much as Steinbrenner has?


Steinbrenner’s method of signing players to absurd contracts, making it impossible for smaller teams to compete, is another one of baseball’s issues the Yankees employ.


You could say I’m just a bitter fan of a “Moneyball” team who is tired of seeing his team’s best players bought up by the Yankees. But they essentially bought their American League Championship this year, and if they win the World Series they will have their inflated payroll to thank for that as well.


The Yankees pluck the best players from clubs all around baseball, pulling them away from fans with massive salary offers no one can compete with. I’m not an advocate for a baseball salary cap, but you would be hard pressed to find a better argument in favor of it than the “Evil Empire.”


The new Yankee Stadium even takes those terrible qualities from the field to the stands.
I made my view of absurd new stadiums clear a couple of weeks ago, and there is no bigger offender than the Yankees’ new home. After tearing down a shrine to baseball history, they erected a new one bowing down to everything that is wrong about modern baseball stadiums.


Of course, there are the now-famous “Legends Suite” tickets, which cost $1,250 per game—after the Yankees halved the ticket cost when they realized people wouldn’t pay $2,500 for one baseball game, absurd ticket prices aren’t the only terrible thing about the new Yankee Stadium. The stadium is an awful attempt to create a sense of history in a gaudy new park, while the whole building is plastered with obtrusive advertisements.


This is by no means a complete list of the Yankees’ terrible attributes—let’s not forget that the Yankees have an admitted steroid user leading their offense, their broadcasters (specifically John Sterling and Suzyn Waldman) are some of the biggest homers in baseball, and their fans are some of the worst in all of sports.


People don’t hate the Yankees because they’re jealous of them. Sure, I would love for my team to win 26 World Series titles, or possibly 27 depending on the next couple of weeks, but the real reason people despise the Yankees is because of what they represent.


A Republican friend of mine jokes that he likes the Yankees because they represent everything that’s good about big business: they have the most money, so they get the best talent and win world championships at the expense of smaller teams.


He’s right: the Yankees are the sports equivalent of a massive corporation, dominating their competition and stuffing their own pockets with championships. Their owner’s style, player acquisitions and even stadium are all part of an homage to the absurd wealth that has so deeply impacted baseball.


Teams like the Yankees have caused me to drift further and further from baseball in the past five years, and they embody everything I can’t stand about what the sport has become.


Think it’s not the Yankees’ fault because you have to blame the game, not the player? Or are the Yankees just fun to hate? E-mail Nico at savidgewilki@wisc.edu.
 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

10 comments Log in to Comment

Carl Sanger
Sat Oct 31 2009 11:10
Nico, I warmly applaud your writing about the farce that the Yankees have made baseball become. I live in New York and have grown to hate that team just a little bit more every year. You have to understand that I grew up in a time when every team had pretty much the same shot at building and maintaining a good team. Though a Mets fan as a kid, admittedly, I grew to love and respect teams from the "smaller markets" when they built contenders. I loved, for instance, the Kansas City Royals in the George Brett era, the Pittsburgh Pirates of the Willie Stargell era, and others. This respect came from a love for the game and a recognition and admiration of talent (which is something Yankee "fans" can't bring themselves to do, I've noticed over the years). If you read Ralph Kiner's wonderful book, you will actually see that the Yankees always had a distinct advantage over everyone else due to money, even in Kiner's day, but it just didn't create as gross a disparity as we have now. That is pretty much why they have all those championships they think they actually earned. Today, of course, we see a winter like last year's where the smaller-market teams can not even dream of landing a free-agent and have basically resigned themselves to being feeder teams to the two or three teams that can afford signing one or more free-agents consistently. The Yankees, on the other hand, can and do make pigs of themselves not signing one free agent but the three best last off-season. (Look at the playoffs this year and see who their number one and two pitcher is that they didn't even have last year!) It just gets me when their fans "root" for this team and just pretend that they're really competing on a level playing field - then act surprised when they win. I liken this to the metaphor that I try to make Yankee fans see: Imagine that you are living in a basement apartment and all you want to do is get a house. You go looking for your dream home and every time you find one, Warren Buffett comes along and outbids you. Now imagine that there are throngs of Buffett fans watching him shop with unlimited resources to buy in your neighborhood. Every time he buys the property that you want, Buffett fans cheer, acting like he had accomplished some great feat. And, at the end of the day, you are relegated to go back home to the basement. How fair do you think that would be to your family and fans? This all boils down to one of my many sayings about the Yankees --- you can be a Yankee fan or you can be a baseball fan but you can't be both.
Jeff Allen
Thu Oct 29 2009 16:07
M F - I will digress on one point: "And you can't argue against that fact at all: the Yankees buy their way into the World Series every year."
Obviously not EVERY year, but you understand the context of the point - the money grants them a huge advantage.
Jeff Allen
Thu Oct 29 2009 13:09
M F - sure, hide behind the salary cap as a crutch....

It DOES illustrate the point because it highlights the ridiculous disparity in team salaries. It's so straightforward.... the Yanks are spending 5.5 x what the Marlins are spending. Do you honestly think that's fair? Does that really allow for fair competition in sport? Come on, I'm sure you have more intelligence than that.... Yes, it brings up the whole salary cap argument, but if that's the problem, so be it.

Carly Evans
Wed Oct 28 2009 23:34
First off, even bringing up the argument that you need a team to hate is ridiculous. Money doesn't need to have anything to do with hating teams and unifying a sports nation. A sports nation doesn't need to be unified. That's the point. Baseball in general is what unifies you.
The unity should come from loving your hometown team. You find hatred in rivalries. There's plenty of unification there.

Every stupid Yankees fan will say that other teams CAN compete, but that they just need to be more clever in finding out ways to do so. I would loooove to see what would happen to the Yankees if there were to be a salary cap put in place. Although their farm system is definitely improving, they would be up the creek without a paddle if they couldn't bring in their usual star studded rosters. So don't even bring that argument. I'd like to see the Yankees think outside of the box for once. How about actually developing your teams each year instead of just bringing in new players every single year. Sure is easy to talk about "thinking outside the box" when you sure don't have to.

The fact of the matter remains that teams simply can't compete knowing that even when they do develop great players in their farm systems, as soon as these players' contracts are up they're going to be going somewhere else that will pay them more. Sure you can get a number of good years out of all these players, but I'm willing to bet that the Twins would have been better had they been able to afford to keep Santana, Hunter, and a number of other players.
The players move to other teams "in hopes" of winning a championship, but they also do it because hey, who wouldn't want a few hundred thousand more?

And yes, at this point, there is no salary cap in baseball, so naturally, every management team will do whatever they can, with whatever they have. However, that doesn't make it right and doesn't mean they're doing anything good for baseball. If each team were to have a more-or-less equal chance at making it that year (at least theoretically, like in the NFL), then maybe there would be more consistent sell outs. You wouldn't need these big name teams coming into town to do it. Make it a more even playing field and guaranteed, you will see changes in attendance in baseball.

Also, players do not love George Steinbrenner. Read anything about his reign in New York and you will find several players who love him, sure. They're the ones who get to stay in New York (aka Jeter and a few select others). Plenty of players hate him and were terrified of him, but they loved Joe Torre so they stuck around. Steinbrenner is notorious for treating his players and staff like shit. What's not to love?

And yes, at this point, there is no salary cap in baseball, so naturally, every management team will do whatever they can with whatever they have. However, doesn't make it right and doesn't mean they're doing anything good for baseball.

New Yankee stadium is beautiful (aside from the cracks in the cement in the ramps of course... good work there New York). The sight-lines are great. Although I'm not sure how I feel about it, at least they're trying to maintain some of the old history of the place, which, especially with a team as historic as the Yankees, I can absolutely respect.
New ballparks are a part of baseball now, since it's been turned into a business instead of a game. But really, $2500 for a box seat? How about leaving baseball to be a sport for the masses instead of the uppity business types?

In closing, the Yankees have become the most cliché team in baseball (tied of course, with the Red Sox). Anyone who thinks that they can say 2 things about baseball just looooves them. Everyone knows ARod is dating Kate Hudson, everyone knows everything that happens with the team. What's not to love about a team that can just buy their way into the playoffs and World Series (that being said, there sure haven't been many championships this decade even though their payroll is just outrageous). Of course they're expected to win every year, they have the highest payroll in baseball (by 76thousand). Can't imagine that they would have this expectation without the payroll.
Any true baseball fan loves baseball for more than the winning and the losing (yes, the winning part is nice... yes I have to say that we love winning and losing when MN does so much of the losing part). But really. Unless you have some real connection to New York, there is no reason to be a Yankees fan. So love the game for what it is-- a sport and NOT an industry. How can you have any real connection with your team when, overall, your roster is so fluid?

Because the Yankees are making baseball such a business-- they are completely and absolutely, without a doubt, everything that is wrong with baseball.

M F
Wed Oct 28 2009 14:29
I read the comments, and I'm back for round two:

1) Steinbrenner bought the team in the 70's for $10 Million. He pumped back penny after penny into an 'awful' franchise. Up until the early 1990's the Yankees were among the worst teams in baseball...remember? For that matter, so were the Mets. That's back when the Blue Jays, the Twins, and the A's were dominating. Steinbrenner now owns the most expensive franchise in sports, but he pumped a lot of the money he could have taken away back into the team (antonyms: Nationals).

2) Dan Daren - Know your facts if you're going to talk. The team with the best record at the end of the season gets to pick 'which' series they want to play. The one starting Wednesday or Thursday. It's strategy, not bad sportsmanship. You can't blame the Yankees for that. Plus, the extra off day afforded them the ability to rest their ace more. The schedule is actually all wacky because Fox wanted to air the first night of the World Series on a Wednesday (good TV night). Therefore, the playoffs get stretched and series get all messed up with regards to dates. Again, if you're going to blame anyone...blame MLB and Fox. It's not the Yankees fault (again...always blame the number ones...right?).

3) Jeff Allen - Your percentages are based on capped vs. uncapped sports...it doesn't work. Also, read my above post. There have been 7 winners of World Series this decade...yet the Pats won the super bowl 3 times within a few years. If you're judging according to your standards...there's more parity in baseball than Football.

Everyone talks about the rise of football and the downfall of baseball. it has nothing to do with the Yankees (who are comparable to the Patriots). It has everythign to do with the commissioners. Goodell has focused on discipline and marketing, which has distracted any discussion away from steroids and the like. Selig, on the other hand has tried to please small market teams by villainizing big market teams. It has led to a lot of infighting about salaries and such, and also blew the lid open on steroids.

The Yankees have no part of the football v. baseball argument, so leave them out. If anything, a team like the Yankees, acting as teh villain, keeps the sport interesting.

M F
Wed Oct 28 2009 14:18
I don't want to repeat everything Yankee fans always say, so I will point out a few things you may have overlooked.

1) Stadiums - You claim Yankee stadium is the biggest offender of 'everything that is wrong with modern baseball stadiums'. I'd like to know you are referring to with the new Yankee stadium. It has the best sight lines in baseball allowing fans in every seat to clearly see the game (unlike older stadiums like Fenway). Also, teams continue to rip down their old stadiums and erect new ones because MLB forces the teams to split the gates on all games. This is a fact that really drives me mad about baseball fans. New stadiums are built, because the income from the luxury boxes don't have to be split. When MLB started 'taxing' teams for having good attendance, they all decided to build new stadiums to keep more of their deserved revenue. Don't blame the teams...blame MLB and whiny, crybaby owners and fans such as yourselves who complain about big-market teams taking all of the revenue.

2) Some team always has to be number one, and that team will be hated for it. However, those number ones are fueling the rest of the industry. Attendance jumps when a 'good' team like the Yankees come to town. That raises revenue for every team in baseball....ESPECIALLY if they built a new stadium. Case in point - I hate basketball, I would never consider going to a Knicks game (I don't claim to be a fan), but if Lebron is in town..I might go check him out just to tell my grand kids I saw him play in the flesh.

3) The Yankees 'buy' teams? Please. That must be why the Rays won the AL pennant last year, or why there's been 7 different WS winners this decade. Just like you're republican friend said, baseball is a capitalist industry. If you want to exceed you need a competitive edge. Teams need to think outside the box. The Rays are doing a terrific job of it, for example. We've known for years that the Angels are a speedy team who'll always think about the extra 90 feet. If the Royals are so bummed out to be the Royals, they should start focusing on something they can sell. Develop excellent fielding corner outfielders for example, or focus on strong middle relievers. Then trade players before they become big time free agents.

4) If I make no other point, I make this. If it wasn't for the Yankees, who would everyone hate? What would unite the rest of the baseball world? 'Red Sox Nation' was a response to the 'Evil Empire'. I mean...even the Red Sox marketed themselves as the anti-Yankees. Get over your inferiority complex and create your own identities already.

In closing, Nico...did you write an article about baseball last year when the Phillies were playing the Rays...or did all of these thoughts just enter your mind because the Yanks are in the series? I bet you've never had more than 4 comments on an article before. You see, that is the power of the Yankees and the depth and fortitude of their fans. We care. When we win, we are proud. When we lose, we take it. We don't start blaming it on salaries, or another team, and we certainly don't write some lame article about the blood sucking Phillies ruining baseball.

Dan Deren
Wed Oct 28 2009 10:21
This year, in addition to all of the above, if I understood properly, MLB apparently allowed the Yankees to set the beginning day of the first round of the playoffs - so, you had Minnesota winning a late-night, emotionally-draining, gut-wrenching victory. Then, they not only don't have any time to celebrate, along with their fans and savor the win; but, they have to immediately get on a late-night plane flight; and play the Yankees the next night on short rest and emotionally and physically drained - some contest - some competition - some "sportsmanship" (right...) on the part of the Yankees. And Major League Baseball let the Yankees set the day and date of the start of the series. Fuhgeddabout sportsmanship - that's long since dead, if it ever actually existed. But MLB lets the already most powerful franchise dictate the terms and conditions of the next round, to the positive detriment of their opponent. i know life ain't fair, but geez, Louise, don't you think enough of an advantage is enough, already, fer cryin' out loud? People can't stand the Yankees because they are essentially a monopoly. What's wrong with a monopoly? It reduces consumer choice and stifles competition. I suppose if you're the Yankees owner or a fan, that's a good thing - maybe - myself, I always liked competitive games, not knowing that the deck was so stacked in favor of one side that the outcome was likely not in doubt. If you're anyone else other than a Yankees fan (and I'm leaving out so-called purists of all stripes), it isn't a good thing. And, in the case of the Yankees setting the terms and conditions of the next round of play, well, the simple fact is that I find it unconscionable that MLB let the Yankees essentially 'have their way' with the opposing team in this fashion, in this case the Twins. Okay, so the Yankees win - maybe their fans care - I guess I'm sure they do. I sure don't...
Jeff Allen
Tue Oct 27 2009 23:05
Am I the only one here, or does BUYING a world championship not take the sportsmanship out of the sport???
And you can't argue against that fact at all: the Yankees buy their way into the World Series every year.

Now some will argue that baseball, like every other major sport, is also a business. Yes, it has a business component (teams want to make money, so do players.... just as businesses, employees, execs, etc.) But sport is sport, based on sets of rules to ensure fair play. Sure, in boxing you could set up a 5'8" 150 lb against a Mike Tyson, but what the heck is the point? It's not a sport then.

I haven't been an MLB fan for over 10 years now... I got turned off a long time ago. But take my favorite sport, the NFL. You know what I love about it? It's the fact that every single season, you have absolutely no idea which team will win the SuperBowl. Sure, there are some teams more powerful than others, but the point is they don't BUY their championships. They earn it through hard work, training, coaching, etc.

The main point is look at the 4 major sports, and the highest salaried team as a percentage of the lowest in 2008/9:
NFL = 182%
NHL = 185%
NBA = 223%
MLB = 547%

Where on earth is the parity in the MLB??? That is exactly what is wrong with the Yankees - simply put, they are BUYING their championships. What a disgrace to a sport!!

Randy Johnson
Tue Oct 27 2009 21:41
your first point in the yankees being a good franchise is dumb, of course there going to love him he overpays all of them because he can! Which also makes the point about players wanting to play for a championship team a dumb point too, if the yankees weren't very good people would still go there because in todays day and age the professional sports athletes main objective is to get as much money as they can, while they can realizing that they're not going to be doing much else with there life besides playing baseball. I will agree with you that the part about salary cap vs no salary cap making no sense. If you wanted to get on that subject though i guess we could, the greatest sport in the world(professional football hands down) has a salary cap. The reason why the NFL thrives so much is because the fans of all 31 teams (i exclude the Raiders because until Al Davis is relieved of his duties USC could beat them) and the reason why all these fans get excited is because they believe weather its just in the smallest way that they’re team has a shot reason why, a salary cap. One of the way they get excited is through the draft process. With the exception of Michael Crabtree when was the last time you can remember a football player not playing part of a season? Now, your probably asking yourself “what does this have to do with baseball and a salary cap?” well, in baseball the Yankees and other big market teams(Boston, Chicago, LA ect. Ect.) have one thing in common, they can take a chance on a kid they may be leaning towards going to college that teams like the brewers twins royals can’t. The reason why is really simple, they throw a ton of money at them that if they refused they’d be stupid! The bottom line is the New York Yankees are hands down the most corrupt hated team in professional sports period no questions asked! Look at the numbers!
Matt Brieger
Tue Oct 27 2009 17:35
This article reminds me of every conversation I’ve ever had with so-called “Yankee Haters.” While trying to show how the Yankees are terrible for baseball (and a terrible team in general), you have actually proven how great they really are.

First, you start with George Steinbrenner, and how players hate him. Players LOVE him, and love playing for him even more. Players want to be in New York because the ownership there is committed to winning EVERY year. If you want to win a title, you go to the Yankees.

Second, you claim to not be an advocate for a salary cap in baseball, yet you are complaining that the Yankees are spending money to bolster their lineup. If you do not want a salary cap, you must be okay with the current system, and all the Yankees are doing is excelling in that system. If you want to argue salary cap vs. no salary cap, that’s a different issue. But don’t claim to support the current system and then attack the Yankees for doing exactly what that system calls for.

Next, you list several other “terrible attributes” of New York. First the steroid issue. This is simple, in that it is completely naive to think there is a team in MLB that has not had steroid users helping them (Barry Bonds with the Giants for the last decade, Manny Ramirez & David Ortiz with the World Series winning Red Sox in 2004, need I go on?). Next, team broadcasters are supposed to be homers! Bob Uecker is an obvious homer, which makes listening to a Brewers’ game on the radio that much more enjoyable.

But besides these points, the real reason New York is the best franchise in all of sports is that they are expected to win every year. There is never a year (like last year for the Brewers) when a trip to the playoffs is considered a success. The only thing that matters in New York is winning the World Series every year. This expectation has come from New York’s history and tradition of winning, and is unparalleled anywhere else in sports.

The Yankees represent everything that is great about baseball. New York’s history, tradition, and commitment to winning are things that every other team in every other sport strives for.

Go Yankees!

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In